Cricket fans, prepare for a heated debate! 🏏
Is Washington Sundar the right fit for India’s No. 3 batting position?
Former Indian cricket legend Sourav Ganguly has sparked a discussion that might divide opinions. In a recent interview, Ganguly questioned Sundar’s suitability as a No. 3 batter in Test cricket, especially in challenging conditions abroad.
But here’s where it gets controversial: Sundar, a talented all-rounder, impressed with his recent performances, scoring 29 and 31 in the first Test against South Africa. However, Ganguly believes that India should prioritize specialists for the top batting positions, stating, ‘Your top five batters must be specialists.’
Ganguly, now the CAB president, specifically mentioned countries like England, Australia, and New Zealand, where he thinks Sundar might struggle. This raises an intriguing question: Are all-rounders undervalued in Test cricket?
During India’s tour of England and the subsequent home series, other players like Sai Sudarshan and Karun Nair took on the No. 3 role. As India gears up for the second Test against South Africa on November 22, the team’s batting order remains a topic of interest.
And this is the part most people miss: While Ganguly’s comments highlight the importance of specialists, they also open a discussion on the role of all-rounders in modern Test cricket. Is there a balance to be found, or should teams strictly rely on dedicated batters and bowlers?
What do you think? Is Ganguly’s assessment fair, or is there more to the story? Share your thoughts below, and let’s keep the cricket conversation going!